
Why Combining Pressure Mapping and 3D iPhone Scanning Is Essential for Modern Foot Biomechanics Assessment
, Von Hugh Sheridan, 9 min Lesezeit

, Von Hugh Sheridan, 9 min Lesezeit
Using both pressure mapping and 3D scanning is no longer optional—it is becoming the gold standard in modern clinical practice.
The human foot is a complex structure—26 bones, 33 joints, hundreds of muscles and ligaments—working in harmony to absorb impact, stabilise movement, and propel the body forward. When pain, deformity, or pathology appears, traditional clinical observation alone is no longer enough. Modern orthotic practice increasingly relies on two complementary digital tools:
Plantar pressure measurement (e.g., pressure plates or in-shoe sensors)
3D foot shape scanning (now easily accessible via iPhone LiDAR or photogrammetry)
Individually, each tool offers important data.
Together, they provide a complete picture of both function (pressure) and form (geometry). This dual-modality approach significantly increases diagnostic accuracy and improves orthotic design—especially for high-performance athletes and high-risk diabetic patients.
A plantar pressure scan records:
Peak pressure points
Pressure-time curves
Gait line / centre of pressure (COP)
Symmetry between left and right foot
Timing of stance phase (heel strike → midstance → toe-off)
Forefoot loading patterns
Risk areas for breakdown or overload
This is functional data—showing how the patient loads the foot during movement.
A 3D scan records:
Arch height & foot posture
Foot length, width, volume
Heel shape & calcaneal alignment
Forefoot deformities (bunions, splay, claw toes)
Soft-tissue contours important for total-contact orthotics
True morphology for CAD/CAM milling or 3D printing
This is structural data—showing the physical shape that must interface with the orthotic or footwear.
🟦 Pressure scan alone cannot tell you the foot’s shape.
🟧 3D scan alone cannot tell you how the foot behaves under load.
Using only one is like designing a prosthetic socket without knowing the weight-bearing pattern—or fitting a shoe without knowing the patient’s size.
A clear link between deformity and function
Accurate identification of true pain generators
Understanding of how structure behaves dynamically
A complete map for customised orthotic prescriptions
Reliable baseline data for follow-up comparisons
This is especially important in two groups at opposite ends of the biomechanical spectrum: runners and diabetic patients.
Runners demand:
High efficiency
Optimal shock absorption
Prevention of overuse injuries
Fine-tuned foot alignment for performance
High or low arch morphology
Forefoot width for shoe selection
Calcaneal angle (varus/valgus)
Midfoot volume (for inside-shoe orthoses)
Bony prominences that may cause irritation
Symmetry between left and right feet
Toe shape affecting push-off mechanics
Excessive pronation or supination during stance
High impact at heel strike
Medial loading increasing risk of tibial stress
Lateral forefoot overload risking peroneal or metatarsal injury
Timing abnormalities (too rapid transition to forefoot)
Asymmetries that contribute to knee or hip issues
A runner’s orthotic can now address:
Control of excessive pronation informed by dynamic pressure
Precise medial arch contour from 3D geometry
Metatarsal pad placement based on pressure-time data
Heel cup depth that matches exact morphology
Performance optimisation through improved energy return
Outcome:
A more efficient gait, reduced risk of injury, and improved comfort during long-distance running.
Diabetic feet have entirely different priorities:
Ulcer prevention
Offloading high-risk areas
Protecting insensate tissue
Ensuring total contact to disperse forces
Monitoring changes over time
Foot collapse, Charcot deformity, rocker deformities
Areas of bony prominence (navicular, metatarsal heads)
Edema-related volume changes
Asymmetry due to previous ulceration
Accurate geometry for total-contact insoles
Realistic shape replication for 3D printed therapeutic footwear
Localised peak pressures (>200–600 kPa)
High-risk zones for future ulcers
Lack of forefoot/toe-off pressure (neuropathy)
Instability or poor balance
Abnormal COP path indicating compensatory gait
Early signs of tissue breakdown not visible externally
A diabetic orthotic can now address:
Precise offloading of metatarsal heads where pressure is highest
Total-contact design using 3D morphology
Accommodation for deformities like Charcot midfoot collapse
Gentle control of foot motion based on functional data
Creation of custom rocker soles tuned to the patient’s pressure line
Long-term monitoring via repeat scans (volume + pressure comparison)
Outcome:
Reduced ulcer risk, better stability, improved mobility, and enhanced patient safety.
| Factor | Runner (Performance) | Diabetic Patient (Risk Management) |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Efficiency & injury prevention | Ulcer prevention & safe mobility |
| Pressure Scan Focus | Pronation control, impact forces, forefoot loading patterns | High-pressure hotspots, COP abnormalities, balance issues |
| 3D Scan Focus | Arch geometry, volume, alignment for orthotic precision | Total-contact geometry, deformity capture, volume for therapeutic footwear |
| Clinical Value of Combined Data | Enhances performance optimisation and reduces overuse injuries | Prevents life-threatening ulcers and provides precise offloading |
| Orthotic Style | Dynamic control, lightweight performance insoles | Total contact, offloading, rocker soles, diabetic-safe materials |
| Follow-up Importance | Performance tracking | Essential for monitoring progressive deformity |
Using both pressure mapping and 3D scanning is no longer optional—it is becoming the gold standard in modern clinical practice.
For runners, it provides the precision needed for performance and injury prevention.
For diabetic patients, it provides life-saving information for safe offloading and ulcer prevention.
By integrating function (pressure) and form (3D shape), clinicians create orthotics that are:
More accurate
More comfortable
More effective
More predictable in outcome
Fully aligned with digital manufacturing (CNC, CAD/CAM, 3D printing)
This combination represents the future of orthotic practice—data-driven, patient-specific, and clinically superior.
Using both pressure mapping and 3D scanning is no longer optional—it is becoming the gold standard in modern clinical practice.
LiDAR vs. Structured-Light 3D Scanners in Orthotics & Prosthetics: What Clinicians Need to Know
In the fast-evolving landscape of digital fabrication for orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) device production, it’s tempting to assume that 3D printing is the inevitable future....