As digital workflows continue to reshape orthotic practice, Supramalleolar Orthoses (SMOs) have become one of the clearest case studies for comparing traditional fabrication with additive manufacturing. Two approaches now sit side by side in many clinics: 3D-printed TPU SMOs and EVA draped (vacuum-formed) SMOs. Each has strengths, limitations, and very different implications for clinics, patients, and scalability.

This article breaks down the comparison in practical, workshop-level terms.

Material & Manufacturing Overview

3D-Printed TPU SMO

Thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) is a flexible, elastic material well suited to additive manufacturing. Using a digital scan and CAD model, the SMO is printed layer by layer, often overnight, with stiffness controlled through wall thickness, infill patterns, and geometry rather than material change.

Key characteristics

• Digital-first workflow

• No positive model or plaster

• Repeatable and easily modified

• Minimal post-processing

EVA Draped SMO

EVA (ethylene-vinyl acetate) SMOs are produced by heating EVA sheets and draping or vacuum-forming them over a positive model. This remains a gold standard in many paediatric and low-resource settings due to its forgiving nature and tactile finish.

Key characteristics

• Hands-on craftsmanship

• Requires positive model (cast or milled)

• Material stiffness controlled by EVA density and thickness

• Immediate visual and tactile feedback during forming

Fit, Function & Clinical Performance

TPU SMO

• Excellent anatomical conformity when based on high-quality scans

• Consistent medial-lateral control due to uniform wall geometry

• Elastic recoil can improve comfort and compliance

• Ventilation and flexibility zones can be digitally designed

Clinical note: TPU SMOs perform well for mild-to-moderate instability and where repeatability or remote design is important.

EVA Draped SMO

• Slightly more forgiving fit, especially for soft tissue variation

• Easier to spot-adjust and grind chairside

• Often preferred for very young children or fluctuating anatomy

Clinical note: EVA excels where frequent modifications are expected or where scanning is difficult.

Workflow & Productivity

 

From a clinic efficiency standpoint, TPU printing shifts labour from the workshop to the computer—freeing skilled technicians for complex cases while enabling centralised or outsourced production.

Durability & Lifecycle

• TPU SMOs maintain shape well over time but can suffer from layer fatigue if poorly designed or printed with incorrect parameters.

• EVA SMOs may compress and soften with prolonged use, particularly in high-activity children, but are easy to reheat and rework.

Cost & Scalability

• TPU printing reduces material waste and scales well across multiple sites, making it attractive for networks, NGOs, and high-volume services.

• EVA draping has a lower equipment barrier and remains cost-effective for single-site clinics with experienced technicians.

So… Which One Is “Better”?

The answer isn’t either/or — it’s case-dependent.

Choose 3D-printed TPU SMOs when:

• You want repeatable, digital records

• Remote design or centralised manufacturing is required

• Consistency across clinicians and locations matters

• You are building a scalable digital workflow

Choose EVA draped SMOs when:

• Chairside adjustability is critical

• Patient anatomy is rapidly changing

• Workshop skill and experience are a key strength

• Equipment access is limited

The Qaadir Perspective

At Qaadir, we see TPU and EVA not as competitors, but as complementary tools. Digital TPU SMOs unlock scale, data, and consistency, while EVA draping preserves clinical intuition and adaptability. The most resilient O&P services will be those that blend both approaches intelligently, guided by patient need rather than technology alone.

The future of SMOs isn’t fully printed or fully manual — it’s deliberately hybrid.

Comments

• We have some diffficulty printing with TPU , ity printing a few laiers and the it stop , we have chance our nozel from .4 toe .8 but it does not work. Wer use Ceality k 2 plus printer. temp at 210-240 c

Deja un comentario

Deja un comentario

Name*

Correo electrónico*

Comentario*

Enviar

• Compartir en:
• WhatsApp
• Deel
• Tweet
• Póngale un alfiler.
• Messenger
• Correo electrónico

---