Why Layerloop may be a better choice than PodoPrinter & other belt-insole systems
, Von Hugh Sheridan, 4 min Lesezeit
For orthotics & prosthetics workshops seeking a future-proof, high-precision continuous belt printer that covers insoles plus orthotic components and supports a broad material palette, the Layerloop platform offers compelling advantages.
Understanding the two machines
-
PodoPrinter’s “SOLE by PodoPrinter” belt-printer is an application-specific insole manufacturing system: a 3D belt printer built for custom insoles, using a foaming filament and dedicated insole CAD workflow.
-
Layerloop’s printers (e.g., the Layerloop XE) support continuous build (“infinite length”) via a roller/tilted axis and are designed for industrial/medical usage including insoles and orthopaedic devices.
Key differentiators where Layerloop may pull ahead
1. Material versatility & industrial credentials
-
Layerloop advertises support for multiple materials: PLA, TPU, PETG, Nylon, TPU, reinforced composites, and specifically mentions “flexible materials… ideal for orthopaedic soles and devices” in the medical sector.
-
PodoPrinter emphasises its own foaming filament (TPU-based) specifically for insole printing.
Implication: If your O&P workshop needs a wider selection of shore-hardness, structural insoles, or hybrid devices (insoles + shell), Layerloop’s broader material compatibility is a potential advantage.
2. Continuous/infinite build architecture
-
Layerloop states that its printer supports a “print size: 250 mm × 250 mm × ∞ mm” via tilted axis + conveyor/roller system.
-
PodoPrinter uses a belt/printer to produce insoles in continuous fashion (belt feed).
Implication: The ability to print “any length” or oversized insoles (e.g., children + oversize footwear) may be stronger in Layerloop’s marketing, giving flexibility beyond standard adult sizes.
3. Fit for orthotics & prosthetics beyond insoles
-
Layerloop’s marketing explicitly mentions “ideal for the medical sector … customised soles and other orthopaedic devices” and notes flexible materials and advanced usage.
-
PodoPrinter is heavily focused on insoles alone.
Implication: If your lab intends to use the printer for insole + orthotic shells or hybrid components (e.g., insoles with shell supports), Layerloop may offer broader future use.
4. Precision, industrial alignment & scalability
-
Layerloop mentions high tolerances (XY axis ~11 µm, Z ~2.5 µm) in its spec sheet for the industrial platform.
-
PodoPrinter’s user interface is designed for simplicity (“no 3D printing knowledge required”) focusing on ease of use.
Implication: For high-precision orthotic insoles (especially medical/diabetic patients) or demands for reproducible quality, Layerloop may offer tighter tolerance potential; PodoPrinter prioritises ease-of-use and clinic workflow.
5. Workflow & future proofing
-
Layerloop mentions “plug-in modules”, continuous build, and industrial mindset (mass production, hot chamber, many materials) in marketing. PodoPrinter emphasises “integrated solution for insoles” with belt printer + software + filament.
Implication: For a lab expecting growth, diversification, or more complex prints later, Layerloop may offer a more modular/expandable platform.
Where PodoPrinter or other belt-printers might still make sense
-
If your lab only prints insoles, wants minimal operator training, and wants the simplest workflow, a dedicated system like PodoPrinter might be optimal (specialised, faster setup).
-
If budget is constrained and you don’t foresee needing orthotic shells or multiple materials, then the simpler system may have cost advantage.
-
Ease-of-use and established workflow in clinics could favour an application-specific machine.
Final takeaway
For orthotics & prosthetics workshops seeking a future-proof, high-precision continuous belt printer that covers insoles plus orthotic components and supports a broad material palette, the Layerloop platform offers compelling advantages. If your need is narrower (just custom insoles, simple workflow, minimal training), the PodoPrinter or other dedicated belt insole printers may be sufficient and more cost-efficient.
Three Dee Bulletin posts
-
Why Layerloop may be a better choice than PodoPrinter & other belt-insole systems
For orthotics & prosthetics workshops seeking a future-proof, high-precision continuous belt printer that covers insoles plus orthotic components and supports a broad material palette, the...
-
The Cheapest Way to 3D Print a Prosthetic Cover — Function, Aesthetics, and Budget in Balance
When done right, total cost per cosmetic prosthetic cover can fall below $20 USD, with print times under 10 hours — a price point that...
-
Why some 3D-printed definitive sockets can feel heavy—and why it’s hard to find the “right” patient
This article unpacks the engineering reasons that can drive weight up, explains selection pitfalls, and clarifies where products from Augo (Invent Medical), Instalimb, and Proteor’s...
